[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Remove the comment on the countereffectiveness of large shared_buffers on Windows
From:       Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut () 2ndquadrant ! com>
Date:       2016-11-30 14:43:49
Message-ID: 019edd7b-0321-8dd6-af31-df86cf1cd5d1 () 2ndquadrant ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/7/16 12:43 AM, amul sul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
> <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 
> > The third paragraph may be redundant, I'm a bit inclined to leave it for kindness \
> > and completeness.  The attached revised patch just correct the existing typo \
> > (large -> larger). 
> 
> I am not agree to having this paragraph either, I'll leave the
> decision to committer.
> 
> > I'll change the status to needs review.
> 
> The new status of this patch is: Ready for Committer

committed

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]