[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Phrase search ported to 9.6
From:       Alvaro Herrera <alvherre () 2ndquadrant ! com>
Date:       2016-03-31 18:14:38
Message-ID: 20160331181438.GA129524 () alvherre ! pgsql
[Download RAW message or body]

What led you to choose the ? operator for the FOLLOWED BY semantics?
It doesn't seem a terribly natural choice -- most other things seems to
use ? as some sort of wildcard.  What about something like "...", so you
would do
  SELECT q @@ to_tsquery('fatal ... error');
and 
  SELECT q @@ (tsquery 'fatal' ... tsquery 'error');

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]