[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] includedir_internal headers are not self-contained
From:       Tom Lane <tgl () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us>
Date:       2014-04-30 22:17:39
Message-ID: 8501.1398896259 () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-04-28 13:20:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Printing anything other than the relation OID here is irrelevant,
>> misleading, and inconsistent with our practice everywhere else.

> I don't think it's really comparable to the other scenarios. We should
> print the oid, just as relation_open() does, but the filenode is also
> rather helpful here. How about the attached?

Applied along with a bit of other cleanup.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]