[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE/SHARE incompatibility with GROUP BY, DISTINCT, HAVING and window functions
From:       Michael Paquier <michael.paquier () gmail ! com>
Date:       2014-01-31 22:49:53
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRsyvp6dU7AT6V9qbNLJu_Eo2ByyGZSD0ytwe4p-XwkRw () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug  5, 2013 at 04:20:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> By having a look at the documentation of SELECT, it is not specified that FOR
>> SHARE/UPDATE and friends are incompatible with the clauses in $subject
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-select.html
>> This restriction is explicitly cited for INTERSECT and UNION though, so people
>> can get easily confused IMHO for the other clauses.
>>
>> Does it make sense to mention in the documentation those limitations like in
>> the patch attached? If yes, perhaps this should be back-patched, after removing
>> the part about FOR NO KEY UPDATE and FOR KEY SHARE of course from the patch
>> attached for 9.2 and prior versions...
>> Regards,
>
> Patch applied.  Thanks.
Thanks.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]