[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
From:       Bruce Momjian <bruce () momjian ! us>
Date:       2014-01-31 21:41:33
Message-ID: 20140131214133.GT19957 () momjian ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Oct  7, 2013 at 03:02:36PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 2013-10-04 15:15:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> >> Andres, are you (or is anyone) going to try to fix this assertion failure?
> >
> > I think short term replacing it by IsTransactionOrTransactionBlock() is
> > the way to go. Entirely restructuring how cache invalidation in the
> > abort path works is not a small task.
> 
> Well, if we're going to go that route, how about something like the
> attached?  I included the assert-change per se, an explanatory
> comment, and the test case that Noah devised to cause the current
> assertion to fail.

Is there any plan to commit this?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + Everyone has their own god. +


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]