[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Todo item: Support amgettuple() in GIN
From:       Andreas Karlsson <andreas () proxel ! se>
Date:       2013-11-29 17:43:33
Message-ID: 5298D245.6060004 () proxel ! se
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/29/2013 06:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Note that Robert's proposed solution is no solution, because it just
> puts you right back in the bind of needing guaranteed non-lossy
> storage of a TID set that might be too big to fit in memory.

The solution should work if we could guarantee that a TIDBitmap based on 
the fast update pending list always will fit in the memory. That does 
not sound like a good assumption to me.

-- 
Andreas Karlsson


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]