[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
From:       Ray Stell <stellr () vt ! edu>
Date:       2013-05-30 12:42:21
Message-ID: 39CAC308-CE20-410B-A4F5-810438C04E0A () vt ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]


On May 29, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 08:59:42AM -0400, Ray Stell wrote:
> > > [ moved to hacker ]
> > > The question is whether hard-wiring these helps more than it hurts, and which \
> > > ones should be hard-wired.

I seems to me that superuser is exactly that special case and that if an alternate \
superuser is hardwired in the src cluster then -u/-U and that specific value will be \
required on both sides of pg_upgrade, no variability is needed and perhaps not \
possible.  You're point is well taken for port.

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]