[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [GENERAL] difference in query performance due to the inclusion of a polygon geometry field
From:       John R Pierce <pierce () hogranch ! com>
Date:       2012-11-30 21:46:50
Message-ID: 50B9294A.3070807 () hogranch ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 11/30/12 8:30 AM, Ivan Marchesini wrote:
> Thanks but as I said I have tried using psql directly on the server. 
> And still there is a strong difference between the queries execution 
> time with and without the geometric field.
> May be it is a problem of clients but I obtain the same problem with 
> pgadmin, psql and other servers. So I suppose it is not. :-)

query without Geometry is returning 1474 tuples of 133 bytes each.  
thats about 200 kbytes worth of tuples which have to be sorted, then 
converted to client format.

query WITH geometry is returning 1474 tuples of 196111 bytes each. thats 
about 300MB which have to be sorted, then converted to client format.

you're surprised handling 300MB takes longer than 200KB?


-- 
john r pierce                            N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca                         mid-left coast



-- 
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic