[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade's exec_prog() coding improvement
From:       Andrew Dunstan <andrew () dunslane ! net>
Date:       2012-08-31 16:22:20
Message-ID: 5040E4BC.10904 () dunslane ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


On 08/31/2012 10:52 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2012 11:44 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>
>> Again, win32 testing would be welcome.  Sadly, buildfarm does not run
>> pg_upgrade's "make check".
>
>
>
> Yesterday I added a new module to the buildfarm client code to run 
> this 
> (<https://github.com/PGBuildFarm/client-code/commit/ab812cb9920c65e39ec7358dc816371f1fef31eb>). 
> It required a couple of tweaks in the base code. This will be in a new 
> buildfarm client release fairly shortly. It's running on crake now, 
> and I will add it to pitta to get some Windows coverage.
>

but it's not working on pitta :-(

It will take me some time to work out why, and I have several more 
urgent things on my plate. Meanwhile at least we have Linux coverage.

cheers

andrew




-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]