[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Latch implementation that wakes on postmaster death on
From:       Robert Haas <robertmhaas () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-06-30 12:20:00
Message-ID: BANLkTi=hOsATw52DZ+zC-xMz=ag-Gc=eqg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I don't think that the way I've phrased my error messages is
> inconsistent with that style guide, excepty perhaps the pipe()
> reference, but if you feel it's important to try and use "could not",
> I have no objections.

I  like Fujii's rephrasing - we don't usually mention the name of the
system call.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]