[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgresql-general
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.3?
From:       Tom Lane <tgl () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us>
Date:       2002-09-30 18:11:42
[Download RAW message or body]

Greg Copeland <greg@CopelandConsulting.Net> writes:
> Should an advisory be issued for production sites to not perform a
> vacuum full with a notice that a bug fix will be coming shortly?

People seem to be misunderstanding the bug.  Whether your vacuum is FULL
or not (or VERBOSE or not, or ANALYZE or not) is not relevant.  The
dangerous thing is to execute a VACUUM that's not a single-table VACUUM
*as a non-superuser*.  The options don't matter.  If you see any notices
about "skipping tables" out of VACUUM, then you are at risk.

I'm not averse to issuing an announcement, but let's be sure we have
the details straight.

			regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic