[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: postgresql-admin
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] impact of truncate table on indexes
From: Tom Lane <tgl () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us>
Date: 2011-12-22 18:40:22
Message-ID: 17582.1324579222 () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us
[Download RAW message or body]
Dinesh Bhandary <dbhandary@iii.com> writes:
> We have been having some performance issues with indexes right after
> truncating a table.
You'd need to be a lot more specific than that if you want useful help.
Also, pgsql-performance is a better list for discussing performance
issues.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SlowQueryQuestions
> My understanding is truncate removes all the
> contents of the table and the space get reclaimed immediately.
> In such cases what happens to its indexes.
They get rebuilt as empty indexes.
> It does not seem like they
> are removed, but merely marked for deletion by a vacuum job and it
> creates huge bloats and performance problems.
On what do you base this clearly-contrary-to-reality conclusion?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic