[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgis-users
Subject:    Re: [postgis-users] Corrupted topology when using totopogeom in 3D topology
From:       Alexandre Silva <amsilva () infoportugal ! impresa ! pt>
Date:       2022-12-21 11:16:50
Message-ID: AM6PR0302MB343114FCB2E20079062B744EEAEB9 () AM6PR0302MB3431 ! eurprd03 ! prod ! outlook ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Sorry for not replying sooner but only now I could test it.
Can confirm that the topology that was having errors (with around 10k linestrings) \
now finishes without any errors. Thanks for your help.







________________________________
De: postgis-users <postgis-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org> em nome de Sandro Santilli \
                <strk@kbt.io>
Enviado: 3 de novembro de 2022 20:13
Para: PostGIS Users Discussion <postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org>
Assunto: Re: [postgis-users] Corrupted topology when using totopogeom in 3D topology

On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:50:04AM +0000, Alexandre Silva wrote:
> Hey Sandro,
> 
> Thanks for your help.
> Here's the ticket in case anyone wants to follow this bug: \
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.osgeo.org%2Fp \
> ostgis%2Fticket%2F5234&amp;data=05%7C01%7Camsilva%40infoportugal.impresa.pt%7C286c39 \
> bd530848c21ecc08dabdd7ef4c%7Cd227b2e71c404f63b5132f3665c334e6%7C0%7C0%7C638031032388 \
> 985375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiL \
> CJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=sw9O2I6gZefA77pe55kvH5k8k7TGfeN1TcPwa2C4Uuc%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 

Thank you for your report.
The regression should now be fixed in all branches
(was introduced in 3.0.2).

--strk;
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.osgeo.org%2Fma \
ilman%2Flistinfo%2Fpostgis-users&amp;data=05%7C01%7Camsilva%40infoportugal.impresa.pt% \
7C286c39bd530848c21ecc08dabdd7ef4c%7Cd227b2e71c404f63b5132f3665c334e6%7C0%7C0%7C638031 \
032388985375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1ha \
WwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=xacg7UsblIyA2N1h9IzLl32qaPn1c4Jw6ACnLzzPQJw%3D&amp;reserved=0



[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} \
</style> </head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div class="elementToProof"><span style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, \
sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, \
255);" class="elementToProof">Sorry for not replying sooner but only now I could test \
it.</span></div> <div class="elementToProof"><span style="font-family: Calibri, \
Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: \
rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="elementToProof">Can confirm that the topology that was \
having errors (with around  10k linestrings) now finishes without any \
errors.</span></div> <div class="elementToProof"><span style="font-family: Calibri, \
Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: \
rgb(255, 255, 255);" class="elementToProof">Thanks for your help.<br> </span></div>
<div class="elementToProof">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; \
color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> <br>
</div>
<div id="Signature">
<div>
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); \
background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, \
sans-serif;"> <p><span id="ms-rterangepaste-start"></span></p>
<table style="color: rgb(33, 33, 33); font-size: 15px; width: 430px;" width="430">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><br>
</td>
<td><br>
</td>
<td><br>
</td>
<td><br>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" \
style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>De:</b> postgis-users \
&lt;postgis-users-bounces@lists.osgeo.org&gt; em nome de Sandro Santilli \
&lt;strk@kbt.io&gt;<br> <b>Enviado:</b> 3 de novembro de 2022 20:13<br>
<b>Para:</b> PostGIS Users Discussion &lt;postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org&gt;<br>
<b>Assunto:</b> Re: [postgis-users] Corrupted topology when using totopogeom in 3D \
topology</font> <div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>
<div class="BodyFragment"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:11pt;">
<div class="PlainText">On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:50:04AM +0000, Alexandre Silva \
wrote:<br> &gt; Hey Sandro,<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Thanks for your help.<br>
&gt; Here's the ticket in case anyone wants to follow this bug: <a \
href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.osgeo.org \
%2Fpostgis%2Fticket%2F5234&amp;amp;data=05%7C01%7Camsilva%40infoportugal.impresa.pt%7C \
286c39bd530848c21ecc08dabdd7ef4c%7Cd227b2e71c404f63b5132f3665c334e6%7C0%7C0%7C63803103 \
2388985375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWw \
iLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;amp;sdata=sw9O2I6gZefA77pe55kvH5k8k7TGfeN1TcPwa2C4Uuc%3D&amp;amp;reserved=0">
 https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.osgeo.org%2Fpo \
stgis%2Fticket%2F5234&amp;amp;data=05%7C01%7Camsilva%40infoportugal.impresa.pt%7C286c3 \
9bd530848c21ecc08dabdd7ef4c%7Cd227b2e71c404f63b5132f3665c334e6%7C0%7C0%7C6380310323889 \
85375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJX \
VCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;amp;sdata=sw9O2I6gZefA77pe55kvH5k8k7TGfeN1TcPwa2C4Uuc%3D&amp;amp;reserved=0</a><br>
 <br>
Thank you for your report.<br>
The regression should now be fixed in all branches<br>
(was introduced in 3.0.2).<br>
<br>
--strk;<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
postgis-users mailing list<br>
postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org<br>
<a href="https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.osgeo \
.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpostgis-users&amp;amp;data=05%7C01%7Camsilva%40infoportuga \
l.impresa.pt%7C286c39bd530848c21ecc08dabdd7ef4c%7Cd227b2e71c404f63b5132f3665c334e6%7C0 \
%7C0%7C638031032388985375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi \
LCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;amp;sdata=xacg7UsblIyA2N1h9IzLl32qa \
Pn1c4Jw6ACnLzzPQJw%3D&amp;amp;reserved=0">https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.c \
om/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.osgeo.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fpostgis-users&amp;amp;dat \
a=05%7C01%7Camsilva%40infoportugal.impresa.pt%7C286c39bd530848c21ecc08dabdd7ef4c%7Cd22 \
7b2e71c404f63b5132f3665c334e6%7C0%7C0%7C638031032388985375%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJ \
WIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;am \
p;sdata=xacg7UsblIyA2N1h9IzLl32qaPn1c4Jw6ACnLzzPQJw%3D&amp;amp;reserved=0</a><br> \
</div> </span></font></div>
</body>
</html>



_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@lists.osgeo.org
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users

--===============0635256281041416798==--

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic