[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgis-users
Subject:    Re: [postgis-users] undefined symbol: DirectFunctionCall2 ?
From:       Sandro Santilli <strk () keybit ! net>
Date:       2011-09-28 11:47:55
Message-ID: 20110928114755.GN18361 () gnash
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:55:50PM -0700, Greg Allensworth wrote:

> So, next questions would be: what went wrong that it was using the
> old .so in the upgrade output, and how do I correct it?
> 
> I suppose one approach is to take the .dump.ascii file, snip out the
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION paragraphs, substitute the correct .so,
> and run those. Does that sound like a good approach, or a Really Bad
> Idea?

The corect approach is snipping out all objects which are _known_
to belong to any version of PostGIS.
This is what the postgis_upgrade.pl script and his successor
new_postgsi_upgrade.pl were written for.

--strk;

  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]