[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: postgis-users
Subject: RE: [postgis-users] Fw: Performance Help
From: "Obe, Regina" <robe.dnd () cityofboston ! gov>
Date: 2007-07-27 14:42:02
Message-ID: 53F9CF533E1AA14EA1F8C5C08ABC08D2023902AA () ZDND ! DND ! boston ! cob
[Download RAW message or body]
--===============1274922432==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7D05C.4C129341"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
1) Not that it would make much of a difference in your query aside from
readability, but I believe your box3d setsrid calls are a bit wasteful.
Your expand function will already return an SRIDd box.
So you can change
l.east_north &&
setsrid(box3d(expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),400)),27700)
to
l.east_north && expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),400)
Also makepoint is a bit faster than pointfromtext, but since you are
dealing with static points, I guess that is not terribly important.
2) Why is your expand area larger than your distance check. You are
going thru probably twice the number of records you need to since your
distance call will never get past the 200 expand mark
You should just be doing
l.east_north && expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),200)
Hope that helps,
Regina
________________________________
From: postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Alan
Cunnane
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:10 PM
To: PostGIS Users Discussion
Subject: [postgis-users] Fw: Performance Help
Hi guys
I have a query here that joins about 10 tables tables and uses two
distance queries. Im am having massive performance issues with it and im
hoping you could help me to tune it or change it so that performance is
increased. All of the columns being used for the joins have indexes and
I have performed ANALYZE and VACUUM on each table. The query is as
follows:
SELECT a.service_id, f.service_id, j.service_id, (k.arrival_time -
a.depart_time) AS time
FROM service1 a, service1 e, bus_stops1 c, stop_link d, service1 f,
stop_link h, service1 i, service1 j, service1 k, bus_stops1 l
WHERE c.east_north &&
setsrid(box3d(expand(PointFromText('POINT(318475
673980)',27700),400)),27700)
AND l.east_north &&
setsrid(box3d(expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),400)),27700)
AND distance(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314 671898.041182569)',
27700),l.east_north) < 200
AND distance(PointFromText('POINT(318475 673980)', 27700),c.east_north)
< 200
AND a.depart_time BETWEEN '13:50' - interval '5minutes' AND '13:50' +
interval '5 minutes'
AND f.depart_time BETWEEN e.depart_time + interval '3minutes' AND
e.depart_time + interval '13 minutes'
AND j.depart_time BETWEEN i.depart_time + interval '3minutes' AND
i.depart_time + interval '13 minutes'
AND a.stop_reference = c.stop_reference
AND e.service_id = a.service_id
AND d.stop_a = e.stop_reference
AND d.stop_b = f.stop_reference
AND f.service_id = i.service_id
AND h.stop_a = i.stop_reference
AND h.stop_b = j.stop_reference
AND j.service_id = k.service_id
AND k.stop_reference = l.stop_reference
AND a.stop_order < e.stop_order
AND f.stop_order < i.stop_order
AND j.stop_order < k.stop_order
ORDER BY time, a.depart_time
LIMIT 1;
This is the EXPLAIN ANALYZE of this query:
Limit (cost=103086.88..103086.88 rows=1 width=28) (actual
time=390489.993..390489.997 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=103086.88..103316.50 rows=91849 width=28) (actual
time=390489.985..390489.985 rows=1 loops=1)
Sort Key: (k.arrival_time - a.depart_time), a.depart_time
-> Merge Join (cost=74721.84..93887.80 rows=91849 width=28)
(actual time=74200.285..380077.222 rows=417915 loops=1)
Merge Cond: ("outer"."?column6?" = "inner"."?column5?")
Join Filter: (("inner".depart_time >=
("outer".depart_time + '00:03:00'::interval)) AND ("inner".depart_time
<= ("outer".depart_time + '00:13:00'::interval)))
-> Sort (cost=63214.89..63583.86 rows=147585 width=38)
(actual time=58256.350..59157.265 rows=233571 loops=1)
Sort Key: (i.stop_reference)::text
-> Nested Loop (cost=2528.29..45913.84
rows=147585 width=38) (actual time=20839.047..50211.661 rows=242984
loops=1)
Join Filter: ("outer".stop_order <
"inner".stop_order)
-> Hash Join (cost=2528.29..21682.94
rows=3180 width=20) (actual time=20838.982..37804.115 rows=8093 loops=1)
Hash Cond:
(("outer".stop_reference)::text = ("inner".stop_b)::text)
Join Filter: (("outer".depart_time >=
("inner".depart_time + '00:03:00'::interval)) AND ("outer".depart_time
<= ("inner".depart_time + '00:13:00
'::interval)))
-> Seq Scan on service1 f
(cost=0.00..14990.58 rows=718258 width=30) (actual time=0.043..14325.330
rows=718258 loops=1)
-> Hash (cost=2527.53..2527.53
rows=306 width=33) (actual time=20602.792..20602.792 rows=1462 loops=1)
-> Merge Join
(cost=1493.57..2527.53 rows=306 width=33) (actual
time=19423.825..20596.730 rows=1462 loops=1)
Merge Cond:
(("outer".stop_a)::text = "inner"."?column5?")
-> Index Scan using
link_stop_a on stop_link d (cost=0.00..2429.39 rows=49872 width=26)
(actual time=0.054..20490.401 rows=20935 l
oops=1)
-> Sort
(cost=1493.57..1493.68 rows=46 width=34) (actual time=10.635..15.345
rows=1464 loops=1)
Sort Key:
(e.stop_reference)::text
-> Nested Loop
(cost=8.59..1492.30 rows=46 width=34) (actual time=0.921..8.670 rows=235
loops=1)
Join Filter:
("outer".stop_order < "inner".stop_order)
-> Nested Loop
(cost=8.59..1484.68 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.856..4.633 rows=7
loops=1)
-> Index
Scan using stops_distance1 on bus_stops1 c (cost=0.00..14.04 rows=1
width=13) (actual time=0.222..0.391
rows=3 loops=1)
Index Cond: (east_north &&
'0103000020346C0000010000000500000000000000EC69134100000000588E244100000
000EC6913
410000000098942441000000006C7613410000000098942441000000006C761341000000
00588E244100000000EC69134100000000588E2441'::geometry)
Filter: ((east_north &&
'0103000020346C0000010000000500000000000000EC69134100000000588E244100000
000EC6913410
000000098942441000000006C7613410000000098942441000000006C761341000000005
88E244100000000EC69134100000000588E2441'::geometry) AND
(distance('0101000020346C0000000000002C7013410000
000078912441'::geometry, east_north) < 200::double precision))
->
Bitmap Heap Scan on service1 a (cost=8.59..1464.97 rows=453 width=30)
(actual time=0.454..1.384 rows=2 loops=
3)
Recheck Cond: ((a.stop_reference)::text =
("outer".stop_reference)::text)
Filter: (((depart_time)::interval >= '13:45:00'::interval) AND
((depart_time)::interval <= '13:55:00'::inter
val))
->
Bitmap Index Scan on service1_stop_reference (cost=0.00..8.59 rows=453
width=0) (actual time=0.135..0.1
35 rows=213 loops=3)
Index Cond: ((a.stop_reference)::text = ("outer".stop_reference)::text)
-> Index Scan
using service1_service_id on service1 e (cost=0.00..5.71 rows=127
width=30) (actual time=0.022..0.249 ro
ws=62 loops=7)
Index
Cond: (e.service_id = "outer".service_id)
-> Index Scan using service1_service_id on
service1 i (cost=0.00..5.71 rows=127 width=30) (actual
time=0.755..1.212 rows=61 loops=8093)
Index Cond: ("outer".service_id =
i.service_id)
-> Sort (cost=11506.95..11612.00 rows=42022 width=33)
(actual time=15890.055..135847.222 rows=33805165 loops=1)
Sort Key: (h.stop_a)::text
-> Merge Join (cost=5908.77..7568.48 rows=42022
width=33) (actual time=5842.981..9827.070 rows=209740 loops=1)
Merge Cond: (("outer".stop_b)::text =
"inner"."?column5?")
-> Index Scan using link_stop_b on stop_link
h (cost=0.00..2429.52 rows=49872 width=26) (actual
time=219.860..4054.111 rows=19252 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=5908.77..5924.94 rows=6466
width=34) (actual time=3098.791..3864.662 rows=210487 loops=1)
Sort Key: (j.stop_reference)::text
-> Nested Loop (cost=8.59..5499.52
rows=6466 width=34) (actual time=417.778..1919.171 rows=44866 loops=1)
Join Filter: ("inner".stop_order
< "outer".stop_order)
-> Nested Loop
(cost=8.59..4440.37 rows=139 width=16) (actual time=386.184..412.717
rows=1907 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using
stops_distance1 on bus_stops1 l (cost=0.00..42.07 rows=3 width=13)
(actual time=302.551..302.750 rows=3 loops=
1)
Index Cond:
(east_north &&
'0103000020346C00000100000005000000000000E0DDEE134100000000147E244100000
0E0DDEE13410000002054842441
000000005EFB13410000002054842441000000005EFB134100000000147E2441000000E0
DDEE134100000000147E2441'::geometry)
Filter: ((east_north
&&
'0103000020346C00000100000005000000000000E0DDEE134100000000147E244100000
0E0DDEE13410000002054842441000
000005EFB13410000002054842441000000005EFB134100000000147E2441000000E0DDE
E134100000000147E2441'::geometry) AND
(distance('0101000020346C0000B5E09BF31DF51341B6E1151534812441'::geo
metry, east_north) < 200::double precision))
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on
service1 k (cost=8.59..1460.44 rows=453 width=30) (actual
time=28.171..32.343 rows=636 loops=3)
Recheck Cond:
((k.stop_reference)::text = ("outer".stop_reference)::text)
-> Bitmap Index Scan
on service1_stop_reference (cost=0.00..8.59 rows=453 width=0) (actual
time=28.038..28.038 rows=636 loop
s=3)
Index Cond:
((k.stop_reference)::text = ("outer".stop_reference)::text)
-> Index Scan using
service1_service_id on service1 j (cost=0.00..5.71 rows=127 width=30)
(actual time=0.043..0.516 rows=55 loops=1907)
Index Cond: (j.service_id =
"outer".service_id)
Total runtime: 390871.465 ms
As you can see it is taking entirely too much time for a query of this
size in my opinion. Therefore im assuming I have done something wrong or
could improve it in some way. I would really appreciate your help.
Sincerely
Alan
________________________________
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign
up for your free account today
<http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter0
7.html> .
________________________________
Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick,
easy and free. Do it now...
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/yahoo_com/trueswitch/*http://uk
..docs.yahoo.com/trueswitch2.html>
________________________________
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, sign
up for your free account today
<http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter0
7.html> .
-----------------------------------------
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be
confidential, legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure
pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is intended
solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<STYLE type=text/css>DIV {
MARGIN: 0px
}
</STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16481" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=538173114-27072007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>1) Not that it would make much of a difference in
your query aside from readability, but I believe your box3d setsrid calls are
a bit wasteful. Your expand function will already return an SRIDd
box.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=538173114-27072007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=538173114-27072007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>So you can change</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=538173114-27072007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>l.east_north &&<BR>
setsrid(box3d(expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),400)),27700)</FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=538173114-27072007></SPAN><FONT face=Arial><FONT
color=#0000ff><FONT size=2>t<SPAN
class=538173114-27072007>o</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN class=538173114-27072007>l.east_north
&& expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),400)</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN class=538173114-27072007>Also makepoint is a
bit faster than pointfromtext, but since you are dealing with static points, I
guess that is not terribly important.</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN class=538173114-27072007>2) Why is your
expand area larger than your distance check. You are going thru probably
twice the number of records you need to since your distance call will never get
past the 200 expand mark</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN class=538173114-27072007>You should just be
doing </SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN class=538173114-27072007><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007>l.east_north &&
expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),200)</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN class=538173114-27072007>Hope that
helps,</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007>Regina</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT><FONT><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=538173114-27072007></SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B>
postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-users-bounces@postgis.refractions.net] <B>On Behalf Of </B>Alan
Cunnane<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:10 PM<BR><B>To:</B> PostGIS
Users Discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> [postgis-users] Fw: Performance
Help<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif">Hi
guys <BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif">
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif">
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif">
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif">
<DIV
style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman,new york,times,serif"><BR>I
hav<FONT size=3>e a query here that joins about 10 tables tables and uses two
distance queries. Im am having massive performance issues with it and im hoping
you could help me to tune it or cha</FONT>nge it so that performance is
increased. All of the columns being used for the joins have indexes and I have
performed ANALYZE and VACUUM on each table. The query is as
follows:<BR><BR><FONT size=2>SELECT a.service_id, f.service_id, j.service_id,
(k.arrival_time - a.depart_time) AS time<BR>FROM service1 a, service1 e,
bus_stops1 c, stop_link d, service1 f, stop_link h, service1 i, service1 j,
service1 k, bus_stops1 l<BR>WHERE c.east_north &&<BR>
setsrid(box3d(expand(PointFromText('POINT(318475
673980)',27700),400)),27700)<BR>AND l.east_north
&&<BR>
setsrid(box3d(expand(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314
671898.041182569)',27700),400)),27700)<BR>AND
distance(PointFromText('POINT(326983.487899314 671898.041182569)',
27700),l.east_north) < 200<BR>AND distance(PointFromText('POINT(318475
673980)', 27700),c.east_north) < 200<BR>AND a.depart_time BETWEEN '13:50' -
interval '5minutes' AND '13:50' + interval '5 minutes'<BR>AND f.depart_time
BETWEEN e.depart_time + interval '3minutes' AND e.depart_time + interval '13
minutes'<BR>AND j.depart_time BETWEEN i.depart_time + interval '3minutes' AND
i.depart_time + interval '13 minutes'<BR>AND a.stop_reference =
c.stop_reference<BR>AND e.service_id = a.service_id<BR>AND d.stop_a =
e.stop_reference<BR>AND d.stop_b = f.stop_reference<BR>AND f.service_id =
i.service_id<BR>AND h.stop_a = i.stop_reference<BR>AND h.stop_b =
j.stop_reference<BR>AND j.service_id = k.service_id<BR>AND k.stop_reference =
l.stop_reference<BR>AND a.stop_order < e.stop_order<BR>AND f.stop_order <
i.stop_order<BR>AND j.stop_order < k.stop_order<BR>ORDER BY time,
a.depart_time<BR>LIMIT 1;</FONT><BR><BR><BR>This is the EXPLAIN ANALYZE of this
query:<BR><BR> <FONT size=2>Limit (cost=103086.88..103086.88 rows=1
width=28) (actual time=390489.993..390489.997 rows=1 loops=1)<BR>
-> Sort (cost=103086.88..103316.50 rows=91849 width=28) (actual
time=390489.985..390489.985 rows=1
loops=1)<BR> Sort Key:
(k.arrival_time - a.depart_time),
a.depart_time<BR> ->
Merge Join (cost=74721.84..93887.80 rows=91849 width=28) (actual
time=74200.285..380077.222 rows=417915
loops=1)<BR> \
Merge Cond: ("outer"."?column6?" =
"inner"."?column5?")<BR> \
Join Filter: (("inner".depart_time >= ("outer".depart_time +
'00:03:00'::interval)) AND ("inner".depart_time <= ("outer".depart_time +
'00:13:00'::interval)))<BR> \
-> Sort (cost=63214.89..63583.86 rows=147585 width=38) (actual
time=58256.350..59157.265 rows=233571
loops=1)<BR> \
Sort Key:
(i.stop_reference)::text<BR> \
-> Nested Loop (cost=2528.29..45913.84 rows=147585 width=38)
(actual time=20839.047..50211.661 rows=242984
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
Join Filter: ("outer".stop_order < \
"inner".stop_order)<BR> &nb \
sp; \
-> Hash Join (cost=2528.29..21682.94 rows=3180 width=20) (actual
time=20838.982..37804.115 rows=8093
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
Hash Cond: (("outer".stop_reference)::text =
("inner".stop_b)::text)<BR>   \
; \
Join Filter: (("outer".depart_time >= ("inner".depart_time +
'00:03:00'::interval)) AND ("outer".depart_time <= ("inner".depart_time +
'00:13:00<BR>'::interval)))<BR> & \
nbsp; \
-> Seq Scan on service1 f (cost=0.00..14990.58 rows=718258
width=30) (actual time=0.043..14325.330 rows=718258
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
-> Hash (cost=2527.53..2527.53 rows=306 width=33) (actual
time=20602.792..20602.792 rows=1462
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
-> Merge Join (cost=1493.57..2527.53 rows=306 width=33) (actual
time=19423.825..20596.730 rows=1462
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
Merge Cond: (("outer".stop_a)::text =
"inner"."?column5?")<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
-> Index Scan using link_stop_a on stop_link d
(cost=0.00..2429.39 rows=49872 width=26) (actual time=0.054..20490.401
rows=20935
l<BR>oops=1)<BR> &nbs \
p; \
\
-> Sort (cost=1493.57..1493.68 rows=46 width=34) (actual
time=10.635..15.345 rows=1464
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
Sort Key:
(e.stop_reference)::text<BR> &nbs \
p; \
\
-> Nested Loop (cost=8.59..1492.30 rows=46 width=34) (actual
time=0.921..8.670 rows=235
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
\
Join Filter: ("outer".stop_order <
"inner".stop_order)<BR> &nb \
sp;   \
; & \
nbsp; \
-> Nested Loop (cost=8.59..1484.68 rows=1 width=16) (actual
time=0.856..4.633 rows=7
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
\
-> Index Scan using stops_distance1 on bus_stops1 c
(cost=0.00..14.04 rows=1 width=13) (actual time=0.222..0.391<BR> rows=3
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
\
Index Cond: (east_north &&
'0103000020346C0000010000000500000000000000EC69134100000000588E244100000000EC6913<BR>4 \
10000000098942441000000006C7613410000000098942441000000006C76134100000000588E244100000 \
000EC69134100000000588E2441'::geometry)<BR> & \
nbsp; &nb \
sp;   \
; & \
nbsp; \
Filter: ((east_north &&
'0103000020346C0000010000000500000000000000EC69134100000000588E244100000000EC6913410<B \
R>000000098942441000000006C7613410000000098942441000000006C76134100000000588E244100000000EC69134100000000588E2441'::geometry) \
AND
(distance('0101000020346C0000000000002C7013410000<BR>000078912441'::geometry,
east_north) < 200::double
precision))<BR>   \
; & \
nbsp; &nb \
sp; \
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on service1 a (cost=8.59..1464.97 rows=453
width=30) (actual time=0.454..1.384 rows=2
loops=<BR>3)<BR> &nbs \
p; \
&n \
bsp; \
Recheck Cond: ((a.stop_reference)::text =
("outer".stop_reference)::text)<BR> &nb \
sp;   \
; & \
nbsp; &nb \
sp; \
Filter: (((depart_time)::interval >= '13:45:00'::interval) AND
((depart_time)::interval <=
'13:55:00'::inter<BR>val))<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
&n \
bsp; \
-> Bitmap Index Scan on service1_stop_reference (cost=0.00..8.59
rows=453 width=0) (actual time=0.135..0.1<BR>35 rows=213
loops=3)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
&n \
bsp; \
Index Cond: ((a.stop_reference)::text =
("outer".stop_reference)::text)<BR> &nb \
sp;   \
; & \
nbsp; \
-> Index Scan using service1_service_id on service1 e
(cost=0.00..5.71 rows=127 width=30) (actual time=0.022..0.249 ro<BR>ws=62
loops=7)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
\
Index Cond: (e.service_id =
"outer".service_id)<BR> &nb \
sp; \
-> Index Scan using service1_service_id on service1 i
(cost=0.00..5.71 rows=127 width=30) (actual time=0.755..1.212 rows=61
loops=8093)<BR>   \
; \
Index Cond: ("outer".service_id =
i.service_id)<BR> \
-> Sort (cost=11506.95..11612.00 rows=42022 width=33) (actual
time=15890.055..135847.222 rows=33805165
loops=1)<BR> \
Sort Key:
(h.stop_a)::text<BR> \
-> Merge Join (cost=5908.77..7568.48 rows=42022 width=33) (actual
time=5842.981..9827.070 rows=209740
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
Merge Cond: (("outer".stop_b)::text = \
"inner"."?column5?")<BR> &n \
bsp; \
-> Index Scan using link_stop_b on stop_link h
(cost=0.00..2429.52 rows=49872 width=26) (actual time=219.860..4054.111
rows=19252
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
-> Sort (cost=5908.77..5924.94 rows=6466 width=34) (actual
time=3098.791..3864.662 rows=210487
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
Sort Key:
(j.stop_reference)::text<BR> &nbs \
p; \
-> Nested Loop (cost=8.59..5499.52 rows=6466 width=34) (actual
time=417.778..1919.171 rows=44866
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; \
Join Filter: ("inner".stop_order <
"outer".stop_order)<BR> &nb \
sp; \
-> Nested Loop (cost=8.59..4440.37 rows=139 width=16) (actual
time=386.184..412.717 rows=1907
loops=1)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
-> Index Scan using stops_distance1 on bus_stops1 l
(cost=0.00..42.07 rows=3 width=13) (actual time=302.551..302.750 rows=3
loops=<BR>1)<BR> &nbs \
p; \
\
Index Cond: (east_north &&
'0103000020346C00000100000005000000000000E0DDEE134100000000147E2441000000E0DDEE1341000 \
0002054842441<BR>000000005EFB13410000002054842441000000005EFB134100000000147E244100000 \
0E0DDEE134100000000147E2441'::geometry)<BR> & \
nbsp; &nb \
sp;   \
; \
Filter: ((east_north &&
'0103000020346C00000100000005000000000000E0DDEE134100000000147E2441000000E0DDEE1341000 \
0002054842441000<BR>000005EFB13410000002054842441000000005EFB134100000000147E2441000000E0DDEE134100000000147E2441'::geometry) \
AND
(distance('0101000020346C0000B5E09BF31DF51341B6E1151534812441'::geo<BR>metry,
east_north) < 200::double
precision))<BR>   \
; & \
nbsp; \
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on service1 k (cost=8.59..1460.44 rows=453
width=30) (actual time=28.171..32.343 rows=636
loops=3)<BR> &n \
bsp; &nbs \
p; \
Recheck Cond: ((k.stop_reference)::text =
("outer".stop_reference)::text)<BR> &nb \
sp;   \
; \
-> Bitmap Index Scan on service1_stop_reference (cost=0.00..8.59
rows=453 width=0) (actual time=28.038..28.038 rows=636
loop<BR>s=3)<BR> &nbs \
p; \
&n \
bsp; \
Index Cond: ((k.stop_reference)::text =
("outer".stop_reference)::text)<BR> &nb \
sp;   \
; \
-> Index Scan using service1_service_id on service1 j
(cost=0.00..5.71 rows=127 width=30) (actual time=0.043..0.516 rows=55
loops=1907)<BR>   \
; & \
nbsp; \
Index Cond: (j.service_id = "outer".service_id)<BR> Total runtime:
390871.465 ms</FONT><BR><BR><BR>As you can see it is taking entirely too much
time for a query of this size in my opinion. Therefore im assuming I have done
something wrong or could improve it in some way. I would really appreciate your
help.<BR><BR>Sincerely<BR><BR>Alan<BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV><BR>
<HR SIZE=1>
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, <A
href="http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html"
target=_blank rel=nofollow>sign up for your free account
today</A>.</DIV><BR></DIV></DIV><BR>
<HR SIZE=1>
Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy
and free. <A
href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/uk/taglines/yahoo_com/trueswitch/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/trueswitch2.html" \
target=_blank rel=nofollow>Do it now...</A></DIV><BR></DIV></DIV><BR>
<HR SIZE=1>
Yahoo! Mail is the world's favourite email. Don't settle for less, <A
href="http://uk.rd.yahoo.com/evt=44106/*http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/winter07.html">sign \
up for your free account today</A>.</BODY></HTML>
<HTML><BODY><P><hr size=1></P>
<P><STRONG>
The substance of this message, including any attachments, may be confidential, \
legally privileged and/or exempt from disclosure pursuant to Massachusetts law. It is \
intended solely for the addressee. If you received this in error, please contact the \
sender and delete the material from any computer. </STRONG></P></BODY></HTML>
_______________________________________________
postgis-users mailing list
postgis-users@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-users
--===============1274922432==--
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic