[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: postgis-devel
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Raster support in 2.0.0
From: "Paragon Corporation" <lr () pcorp ! us>
Date: 2012-03-31 7:42:41
Message-ID: B6353DDFCBA646BBB26EFA0735EDF495 () D
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Devrim,
I suppose its not possible to compile have your own version gdal for
postgres? For windows I have no dependencies because I left out all the
extensions so I just have one dll with barebones tiff etc whatever drivers
are in the source of gdal.. So just have the ones built in gdal.
_____
From: postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net] On Behalf Of Chris
Hodgson
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:26 PM
To: PostGIS Development Discussion
Subject: Re: [postgis-devel] Raster support in 2.0.0
Would it be possible to package a gdal-minimal package which is compiled
with minimal support and thus would require many fewer dependencies? And
then PostGIS would just require a package which provides GDAL-API, provided
by either of gdal or gdal-minimal?
Of course the super-duper awesome solution would be for gdal to resolve it's
dependencies at run-time (like apache modules) but I don't even really
understand what it would take to do that and I doubt it is going to happen.
I must have missed the vote where we decided to make raster a requirement...
that said, I wouldn't want it to NOT be in the redhat packaged version,
simply because gdal had too many pre-reqs.
Chris
On 12-03-30 04:25 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 13:10 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
Devrim: raster is critical in that in the postgis "EXTENSION"
(for PostgreSQL 9.1+) there'll be no separation between core
and raster.
Pff.. That raises a great barrier for PostGIS 2.0 packaging... :( Let's
see what I can do.
Regards,
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 9.00.8112.16441"></HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff text=#000000>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=956134007-31032012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>Devrim,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=956134007-31032012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=956134007-31032012><FONT color=#0000ff
size=2 face=Arial>I suppose its not possible to compile have your own version
gdal for postgres? For windows I have no dependencies because I left out
all the extensions so I just have one dll with barebones tiff etc whatever
drivers are in the source of gdal.. So just have the ones built in
gdal.</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; \
MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV dir=ltr lang=en-us class=OutlookMessageHeader align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT size=2 face=Tahoma><B>From:</B>
postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net
[mailto:postgis-devel-bounces@postgis.refractions.net] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>Chris Hodgson<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, March 30, 2012 2:26 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
PostGIS Development Discussion<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [postgis-devel] Raster
support in 2.0.0<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Would it be possible to package a gdal-minimal package which is
compiled with minimal support and thus would require many fewer dependencies?
And then PostGIS would just require a package which provides GDAL-API,
provided by either of gdal or gdal-minimal?<BR><BR>Of course the super-duper
awesome solution would be for gdal to resolve it's dependencies at run-time
(like apache modules) but I don't even really understand what it would take to
do that and I doubt it is going to happen.<BR><BR>I must have missed the vote
where we decided to make raster a requirement... that said, I wouldn't want it
to NOT be in the redhat packaged version, simply because gdal had too many
pre-reqs.<BR><BR>Chris<BR><BR>On 12-03-30 04:25 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE cite=mid:1333106732.25497.14.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
type="cite"><PRE wrap="">On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 13:10 +0200, Sandro Santilli wrote:
</PRE>
<BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">Devrim: raster is critical in that in the \
postgis "EXTENSION" (for PostgreSQL 9.1+) there'll be no separation between core
and raster.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap="">Pff.. That raises a great barrier for PostGIS 2.0 \
packaging... :( Let's see what I can do.
Regards,
</PRE><PRE wrap=""><FIELDSET class=mimeAttachmentHeader></FIELDSET>
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
<A class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated \
href="mailto:postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net">postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net</A>
<A class=moz-txt-link-freetext \
href="http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel">http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel</A>
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic