[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postgis-devel
Subject:    Re: [postgis-devel] [raster] a more general geomval
From:       Bryce L Nordgren <bnordgren () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-07-22 22:18:09
Message-ID: CAASJHKMCuHYrY53brr20OKTEx3eo=y+=kg2sx6SC=N1Hny-zWQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Pierre Racine
<Pierre.Racine@sbf.ulaval.ca>wrote:

> There is a ticket (#637) having the intent of modifying everything WKT to
> real geometries and hence to a LWGEOM.
>
>
Awesome!


> > For the time being, I think you should write a different one, in order to
> don't
> > introduce too much 'noise' (PostGIS 2.0 is close). I don't know if you
> all agree,
> > guys.
>
> I would not say that PostGIS 2.0 is 'closed' yet and I would say that
> without a more general plan of the indented overall change it is hard to
> answer this question. Any ticket on this? Is this a change for personal
> purpose or is it a proposition of PostGIS Raster change? I still have no
> clear idea...
>
>
I would like to see it changed in PostGIS Raster, so that I can use it
instead of spinning my own. Either way is fine for the moment tho, as #1133
is the big blocker of the moment.

Bryce

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Pierre Racine <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:Pierre.Racine@sbf.ulaval.ca">Pierre.Racine@sbf.ulaval.ca</a>&gt;</span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px \
#ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> There is a ticket (#637) having the intent of \
modifying everything WKT to real geometries and hence to a LWGEOM.<br> <div \
class="im"><br></div></blockquote><div><br>Awesome!<br> </div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, \
204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"> &gt; For the time being, I think you \
should write a different one, in order to don&#39;t<br> &gt; introduce too much \
&#39;noise&#39; (PostGIS 2.0 is close). I don&#39;t know if you all agree,<br> &gt; \
guys.<br> <br>
</div>I would not say that PostGIS 2.0 is &#39;closed&#39; yet and I would say that \
without a more general plan of the indented overall change it is hard to answer this \
question. Any ticket on this? Is this a change for personal purpose or is it a \
proposition of PostGIS Raster change? I still have no clear idea...<br>

<br></blockquote><div><br>I would like to see it changed in PostGIS Raster, so that I \
can use it instead of spinning my own. Either way is fine for the moment tho, as \
#1133 is the big blocker of the moment.<br><br>Bryce <br> </div></div>



_______________________________________________
postgis-devel mailing list
postgis-devel@postgis.refractions.net
http://postgis.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/postgis-devel


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]