[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postfix-users
Subject:    Re: round robin map with ipv4 and ipv6
From:       Wietse Venema <wietse () porcupine ! org>
Date:       2020-02-14 13:58:30
Message-ID: 48Jw2Z3qRtzJrNv () spike ! porcupine ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Emanuel:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
> 
> El 12/2/20 a las 20:14, Wietse Venema escribi?:
> > Emanuel:
> >> Is it possible to create different files with different IP addresses so
> >> that when sending an email they are sent from different round maps?
> > You would use master.cf entries with different smtp_bind_address or
> > smtp_bind_address6 settings, and select one with a filter command.
> >
> > With master.cf entries
> >
> > /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> >      relay-1     unix  -       -       n       -       -       smtp
> >          -o smtp_bind_address=1.2.3.1
> >      relay-2     unix  -       -       n       -       -       smtp
> >          -o smtp_bind_address=1.2.3.2
> >      relay-3     unix  -       -       n       -       -       smtp
> >          -o smtp_bind_address=1.2.3.3
> >      relay-4     unix  -       -       n       -       -       smtp
> >          -o smtp_bind_address=1.2.3.4
> >
> > Then you need a nested table which requires a restriction class.
> >
> > /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> >      smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
> > 	inline:{
> > 	   { 200.58.x.x = class1 }
> > 	   { 200.58.x.y = class2 }
> > 	}
> >
> >      restriction_classes = class1, class2
> >      class1 = check_client_access randmap:{filter relay-1:, filter relay-2:}
> >      class2 = check_client_access randmap:{filter relay-3:, filter relay-4:}
> >
> > Instead of inline:{}, a hash or pcre table would work too.
> 
> YES.! i need this!
> 
> so I can call a file and indicate the class, this is very useful?
> 
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
>      smtpd_client_restrictions = check_client_access
>      inline:{
>         { hash:/etc/postfix/bad_client = class1 }
>         { hash:/etc/postfix/bad_client = class2 }
>      }

No, I wrote INSTEAD OF inline:{}, a hash or pcre table would work.

	Wietse
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]