On 2019-10-17 12:17, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> So you just can't block HTML, because you'll cut yourself off of many
> important messages that you actually want to receive. (However, I give
> HTML-only messages without a plaintext part quite a large spam score in 
> my
> antispam filter).

Interesting to read that you give a spam score based on non-content 
aspects, where you have, in the last few days and ad nauseam, repeatedly 
argued that spam/no-spam should be based solely on content and not on 
other meta-data :)

Cheers.