[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: postfix-users
Subject: Re: base64 encoded emails
From: "Bill Cole" <postfixlists-070913 () billmail ! scconsult ! com>
Date: 2019-10-17 14:35:05
Message-ID: 6894E051-FCCE-4CEE-A15F-AF9AEC214076 () billmail ! scconsult ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 17 Oct 2019, at 7:51, @lbutlr wrote:
> Also., of course, some plaintext messages still have to be
> en=E2=85=BDoded=
> .
>
> Like this one.
But not always in Base64. :)
Many clients only do QP or only do Base64 when the content makes it
necessary, some make a judgment call based (usually) on the frequency of
non-ASCII characters. From a code standpoint, just doing Base64 is
simpler and more robust.
--
Bill Cole
bill@scconsult.com or billcole@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic