[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postfix-users
Subject:    Re: DKIM for locally generated mails - how best to approach?
From:       Andrey Repin <anrdaemon () yandex ! ru>
Date:       2019-02-18 23:58:19
Message-ID: 873433116.20190219025819 () yandex ! ru
[Download RAW message or body]

Greetings, Viktor Dukhovni!

>> There is no need to sign bounces for email that you don't receive
>> but what about non-delivery notifications for mail that is accepted
>> and then later found to be undeliverable?

> In my multi-instance configurations, delivery failure to internal
> recipients does not happen in the outbound output instance, and
> the bad news travels outwards through that separate output
> instance that does the signing.

> Fragmenting Postfix into task-specific instances makes each
> instance easier to manage, but requires some thought in the
> initial design.  It ultimately pays in non-trivial configurations,
> but is probably not for everyone.

It's already fragmented that way internally. Given the level of complication
it takes to set up the mail server in present times, I don't see the need to
waste any more effort than absolutely necessary to make it work.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Tuesday, February 19, 2019 2:36:38

Sorry for my terrible english...

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic