[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: postfix-users
Subject: Re: DKIM for locally generated mails - how best to approach?
From: Andrey Repin <anrdaemon () yandex ! ru>
Date: 2019-02-18 23:58:19
Message-ID: 873433116.20190219025819 () yandex ! ru
[Download RAW message or body]
Greetings, Viktor Dukhovni!
>> There is no need to sign bounces for email that you don't receive
>> but what about non-delivery notifications for mail that is accepted
>> and then later found to be undeliverable?
> In my multi-instance configurations, delivery failure to internal
> recipients does not happen in the outbound output instance, and
> the bad news travels outwards through that separate output
> instance that does the signing.
> Fragmenting Postfix into task-specific instances makes each
> instance easier to manage, but requires some thought in the
> initial design. It ultimately pays in non-trivial configurations,
> but is probably not for everyone.
It's already fragmented that way internally. Given the level of complication
it takes to set up the mail server in present times, I don't see the need to
waste any more effort than absolutely necessary to make it work.
--
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Tuesday, February 19, 2019 2:36:38
Sorry for my terrible english...
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic