[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: postfix-users
Subject: Re: Seperate maps for virtual domains?
From: wietse () porcupine ! org (Wietse Venema)
Date: 2017-06-14 10:59:56
Message-ID: 3wnkDX0b8czJrP5 () spike ! porcupine ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Julian Kippels:
> > You are doing N/2 table lookups to find the table that contains the
> > data. That is, you're doing linear search on top of hashing.
> >
> @Wietse: N/2 is a little pessimistic, but thats only because I know the
> makeup of my mailboxes? 90% of it is in one virtual domain and that
The point is that you're slower than one table, whether it's N/2
or N/somethingelse.
> Anyway, I am going for a single big file now. I assume its not a problem
> that this map is 40MB big?
With a competent key-value store implementation, reading from a
40MB table should be no problem.
Wietse
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic