[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       postfix-users
Subject:    Re: compiling postfix with the right Berkeley DB (again)
From:       LuKreme <kremels () kreme ! com>
Date:       2013-07-24 23:56:15
Message-ID: 84CEE89B-2648-4090-A086-F10F110B3DEA () kreme ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


On 24 Jul 2013, at 04:44 , Jerry <postfix-user@seibercom.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:53:53 -0600
> LuKreme articulated:
> 
>> On Jul 23, 2013, at 16:17, Jerry <postfix-user@seibercom.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Of course. this assumes that you are attempting to install Postfix
>>> via the ports system.
>> 
>> I am not, though db48 was installed via ports. I'm on my phone so
>> it's hard to check, but I thought I included the make line I used to
>> build postfix and what I thought would be the right flags to add.
> 
> Perhaps a dump question, but why would you not install it from the
> ports system?

Other issues unrelated to ports. Short answer: politics and stupidity.

> The port maintainer, <sahil@FreeBSD.org> does an
> excellent job of maintaining the port and usually has any patches or
> updates ready within 48 hours. Few, if any ports are kept as up-to-date
> as Postfix is due to his dedication.

Yep. If it were up to me...

-- 
Internet was down last night. Turns out I have two kids. They seem
pretty well-behaved

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]