[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: portmaster-users
Subject: [Portmasters] Re: Portmaster-users Digest, Vol 9, Issue 21
From: Brendan Pratt <bpratt () overflow ! net ! au>
Date: 2004-02-29 0:00:06
Message-ID: 6.0.0.22.0.20040229095838.039cec80 () pop3 ! overflow ! net ! au
[Download RAW message or body]
Could people please trim their replies to only the relevant section ?
Here's an example of the digest version of this list, and as you can see
when people don't appropriately trim their replies, it makes it very hard
to read, and not only that time consuming to find the new replies.
Thank you.
At 12:51 AM 29/02/04, you wrote:
>Send Portmaster-users mailing list submissions to
> portmaster-users@portmasters.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.portmasters.com/mailman/listinfo/portmaster-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> portmaster-users-request@portmasters.com
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> portmaster-users-owner@portmasters.com
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of Portmaster-users digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: duplicate carriage return (Jake Messinger)
> 2. Re: Re: duplicate carriage return (Michael R. Wayne)
> 3. RE: Stac Compression (Greg)
> 4. Re: Re: duplicate carriage return (Jake Messinger)
> 5. Re: Stac Compression (Chris Cook)
> 6. RE: Stac Compression (Bill Pitz)
> 7. RE: Stac Compression (Greg)
> 8. syslog? (Ben Conner)
> 9. RE: syslog? (Roy)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:05:18 -0600
>From: "Jake Messinger" <jake@portmasters.com>
>Subject: [Portmasters] Re: duplicate carriage return
>To: "Jack Ho" <jho@live365.com>
>Cc: portmaster-users@portmasters.com
>Message-ID: <007c01c3fd5c$42041c10$9600000a@jake>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Im not sure what causes that.
>Has anyone on the mailing list experienced double carriage returns when
>using the pm2 or 25 as a reverse term server?
>
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Visit: portmasters.com
>AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 advmed.com
>8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@jakes.org profjake.com
>Houston, Texas 77074 http://jakes.org homestarrunner.com
>
>
>ICQ# 4403734 YAHOO: prof_jake AIM: profjake MSN: profjake
>
>Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jack Ho" <jho@live365.com>
>To: "Jake Messinger" <jake@portmasters.com>; <support@portmasters.com>
>Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 11:25 AM
>Subject: RE: duplicate carriage return
>
>
> > for example: the portmaster is name as master, and I'm going to access to
> > the server at port s12, i'd send a command like this:
> >
> > telnet master 2012
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > Jack
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jake Messinger [mailto:jake@portmasters.com]
> > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 7:26 AM
> > To: Jack Ho; support@portmasters.com
> > Subject: Re: duplicate carriage return
> >
> >
> > When you telnet to a port thru a portmaster...
> > You mean as a reverse terminal server?
> > Like : telnet 12.13.14.15 6001
> > ?
> >
> >
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> > Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Visit: portmasters.com
> > AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 advmed.com
> > 8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@jakes.org profjake.com
> > Houston, Texas 77074 http://jakes.org homestarrunner.com
> >
> >
> > ICQ# 4403734 YAHOO: prof_jake AIM: profjake MSN: profjake
> >
> > Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
> >
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jack Ho" <jho@live365.com>
> > To: "Jake Messinger" <jake@portmasters.com>; <support@portmasters.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 6:50 PM
> > Subject: RE: duplicate carriage return
> >
> >
> > > In addition, i did not set it to autolog or using security.
> > >
> > > Jack
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jake Messinger [mailto:jake@portmasters.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 2:42 PM
> > > To: Jack Ho; support@portmasters.com
> > > Subject: Re: duplicate carriage return
> > >
> > >
> > > Always or just the first one?
> > > Are you using "autolog" by any chance?
> > > Are you using security on the port?
> > > Is it set for 1/2 duplex?
> > >
> > >
> >
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> > > Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Visit: portmasters.com
> > > AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 advmed.com
> > > 8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@jakes.org profjake.com
> > > Houston, Texas 77074 http://jakes.org
>homestarrunner.com
> > >
> > >
> > > ICQ# 4403734 YAHOO: prof_jake AIM: profjake MSN: profjake
> > >
> > > Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
> > >
> >
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Jack Ho" <jho@live365.com>
> > > To: <support@portmasters.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 1:59 PM
> > > Subject: duplicate carriage return
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi, I got a problem when i telnet to a port through portmaster. I got
> > the
> > > > duplicate "carriage return" when i hit enter. How can i resolve it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Jack
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:23:19 -0500
>From: "Michael R. Wayne" <wayne@staff.msen.com>
>Subject: Re: [Portmasters] Re: duplicate carriage return
>To: portmaster-users@portmasters.com
>Message-ID: <20040227182318.GJ22950@staff.msen.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:05:18PM -0600, Jake Messinger wrote:
> > Im not sure what causes that.
> > Has anyone on the mailing list experienced double carriage returns when
> > using the pm2 or 25 as a reverse term server?
>
>Only when using the Windows telnet which is broken and sends
><cr><lf> when you hit the <cr> key. Workaround is to use ^J
>(<lf>) to terminate your lines.
>
>/\/\ \/\/
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:37:03 -0600
>From: "Greg" <greg@gdsys.net>
>Subject: RE: [Portmasters] Stac Compression
>To: "Lucent Portmaster Users Mailing List"
> <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Message-ID: <AEEJIJACLOPAMJJMHPOLEENAFJAA.greg@gdsys.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
>Okay all you wizards here is an issue we can't seem to figure out.
>
>We have put the STAC cards in and they are recognized properly with the sh
>reg command.
>We configured the client (Win98) and dial in. Now we no longer get a
>v.42biz connection, but it does not show that it is a STAC connection as
>well. Now when I go into the Portmaster and do a Sh SXx to look at the
>session I see the following for the connection ; Interface: ptp5 (PPP,Quiet)
>as you can see there is no indication of STAC there either.
>
>So what are we doing wrong here??
>
>Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
>Greg
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.595 / Virus Database: 378 - Release Date: 2/25/2004
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:40:00 -0600
>From: "Jake Messinger" <jake@portmasters.com>
>Subject: Re: [Portmasters] Re: duplicate carriage return
>To: "Lucent Portmaster Users Mailing List"
> <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Cc: Jack Ho <jho@live365.com>
>Message-ID: <00bc01c3fd61$1efae500$9600000a@jake>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>Thank Michael.
>I use "real" telnet. ;-)
>Ill pass this on to the guy asking me the question.
>
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Visit: portmasters.com
>AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 advmed.com
>8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@jakes.org profjake.com
>Houston, Texas 77074 http://jakes.org homestarrunner.com
>
>
>ICQ# 4403734 YAHOO: prof_jake AIM: profjake MSN: profjake
>
>Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu
>~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael R. Wayne" <wayne@staff.msen.com>
>To: <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 12:23 PM
>Subject: Re: [Portmasters] Re: duplicate carriage return
>
>
> > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 12:05:18PM -0600, Jake Messinger wrote:
> > > Im not sure what causes that.
> > > Has anyone on the mailing list experienced double carriage returns when
> > > using the pm2 or 25 as a reverse term server?
> >
> > Only when using the Windows telnet which is broken and sends
> > <cr><lf> when you hit the <cr> key. Workaround is to use ^J
> > (<lf>) to terminate your lines.
> >
> > /\/\ \/\/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Portmaster-users mailing list
> > Portmaster-users@portmasters.com
> > http://www.portmasters.com/mailman/listinfo/portmaster-users
> >
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:05:57 -0600
>From: Chris Cook <ccook@tcworks.net>
>Subject: Re: [Portmasters] Stac Compression
>To: Lucent Portmaster Users Mailing List
> <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Message-ID: <403F9515.CB213F32@tcworks.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>Did you follow these instructions:
>
>
>http://www.tcworks.net/inetsupport/stac/index.html
>
>
>
>--
>Chris
>
>o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o
>|Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net |
>|The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org |
>o-------------------------------------------------------------o
>
>
>
>Greg wrote:
> >
> > Okay all you wizards here is an issue we can't seem to figure out.
> >
> > We have put the STAC cards in and they are recognized properly with the sh
> > reg command.
> > We configured the client (Win98) and dial in. Now we no longer get a
> > v.42biz connection, but it does not show that it is a STAC connection as
> > well. Now when I go into the Portmaster and do a Sh SXx to look at the
> > session I see the following for the connection ; Interface: ptp5
> (PPP,Quiet)
> > as you can see there is no indication of STAC there either.
> >
> > So what are we doing wrong here??
> >
> > Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:31:13 -0800
>From: Bill Pitz <pitz@sonoma.edu>
>Subject: RE: [Portmasters] Stac Compression
>To: Lucent Portmaster Users Mailing List
> <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Message-ID: <6.0.3.0.2.20040227143002.01b7fb10@mail.sonoma.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>At 10:37 AM 2/27/2004, you wrote:
> >Okay all you wizards here is an issue we can't seem to figure out.
> >
> >We have put the STAC cards in and they are recognized properly with the sh
> >reg command.
> >We configured the client (Win98) and dial in. Now we no longer get a
> >v.42biz connection, but it does not show that it is a STAC connection as
> >well. Now when I go into the Portmaster and do a Sh SXx to look at the
> >session I see the following for the connection ; Interface: ptp5 (PPP,Quiet)
> >as you can see there is no indication of STAC there either.
> >
> >So what are we doing wrong here??
>
>Basically, you have to make sure that you've turned ON software compression
>in the properties for the connection and turned off "Compress Data" in the
>modem configuration. (This disables the modem's built-in hardware
>compression, allowing STAC to take over)
>
>IMO, though, although we've got STAC cards in all of our PM3s, the whole
>thing is kind of a wash since MS had to take STAC compression support out
>of their software.
>
>-Bill
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:24:32 -0600
>From: "Greg" <greg@gdsys.net>
>Subject: RE: [Portmasters] Stac Compression
>To: "Lucent Portmaster Users Mailing List"
> <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Message-ID: <AEEJIJACLOPAMJJMHPOLGEOKFJAA.greg@gdsys.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
>Chris;
>
>Yup, exactly followed those directions.....
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: portmaster-users-bounces@portmasters.com
>[mailto:portmaster-users-bounces@portmasters.com]On Behalf Of Chris Cook
>Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:06 PM
>To: Lucent Portmaster Users Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [Portmasters] Stac Compression
>
>
>Did you follow these instructions:
>
>
>http://www.tcworks.net/inetsupport/stac/index.html
>
>
>
>--
>Chris
>
>o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o
>|Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net |
>|The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org |
>o-------------------------------------------------------------o
>
>
>
>Greg wrote:
> >
> > Okay all you wizards here is an issue we can't seem to figure out.
> >
> > We have put the STAC cards in and they are recognized properly with the sh
> > reg command.
> > We configured the client (Win98) and dial in. Now we no longer get a
> > v.42biz connection, but it does not show that it is a STAC connection as
> > well. Now when I go into the Portmaster and do a Sh SXx to look at the
> > session I see the following for the connection ; Interface: ptp5
>(PPP,Quiet)
> > as you can see there is no indication of STAC there either.
> >
> > So what are we doing wrong here??
> >
> > Any help is greatly appreciated.
>_______________________________________________
>Portmaster-users mailing list
>Portmaster-users@portmasters.com
>http://www.portmasters.com/mailman/listinfo/portmaster-users
>---
>Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.595 / Virus Database: 378 - Release Date: 2/25/2004
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.595 / Virus Database: 378 - Release Date: 2/25/2004
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 02:19:54 -0700
>From: Ben Conner <ben@webworldinc.com>
>Subject: [Portmasters] syslog?
>To: <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Message-ID: <200422821954.326506@bensws>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://www.portmasters.com/pipermail/portmaster-users/attachments/20040228/c845750f/attachment-0001.htm
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 06:47:29 -0800
>From: "Roy" <garlic@garlic.com>
>Subject: RE: [Portmasters] syslog?
>To: "'Lucent Portmaster Users Mailing List'"
> <portmaster-users@portmasters.com>
>Message-ID: <003301c3fe09$cbf815e0$a200a8c0@AA4RE4>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>SYSLOG is a logging function. It does not affect the basic operation of the
>box
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: portmaster-users-bounces@portmasters.com
>[mailto:portmaster-users-bounces@portmasters.com] On Behalf Of Ben Conner
>Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 1:20 AM
>To: portmaster-users@portmasters.com
>Subject: [Portmasters] syslog?
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>
>
>Can someone fill me in on what the syslog function is supposed to perform on
>a PM-3? Is it needed for anything connected to Radius?
>
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>
>
>--Ben
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>+ Ben Conner ben@webworldinc.com
>
>+ Web World, Inc. (888) 206-6486 voice
>
>+ 3145 E Chandler Blvd, Ste 110 PMB 107
>
>+ Phoenix, AZ 85048
>
>+--------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>
>-------------- next part --------------
>An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>URL:
>http://www.portmasters.com/pipermail/portmaster-users/attachments/20040228/71d5b308/attachment.htm
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Portmaster-users mailing list
>Portmaster-users@portmasters.com
>http://www.portmasters.com/mailman/listinfo/portmaster-users
>
>
>End of Portmaster-users Digest, Vol 9, Issue 21
>***********************************************
_______________________________________________
Portmaster-users mailing list
Portmaster-users@portmasters.com
http://www.portmasters.com/mailman/listinfo/portmaster-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic