[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pkgsrc-users
Subject:    Re: libreoffice rpath(?) issues
From:       Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on () yk ! rim ! or ! jp>
Date:       2013-09-27 12:28:06
Message-ID: 20130927.212806.69144941791876249.ryo_on () yk ! rim ! or ! jp
[Download RAW message or body]

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>, Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 13:59:24 +0200

> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 08:52:13PM +0900, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>, Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:47:18 +0200
>> 
>> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 06:26:46AM +0900, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
>> >> Have you tried pkgsrc/wip/libreoffice4-4.1.1.2?
>> >> It has CHECK_SHLIBS_SUPPORTED=no line and shared library check is
>> >> disabled, because soffice shell script has LD_LIBRARY_PATH and
>> >> I feel shared library check does not make sense.
>> > 
>> > Please do not do that. We have run int oa variety of issues with
>> > LD_LIBRAY_PATH created by wrapper scripts for "relocatable" software in
>> > the past and we do not even pretend to allow that anyway. Just make sure
>> > to ensure the correct rpath entries are present and patch it away.
>> 
>> Sure. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is bad . I feel.
>> But libreoffice people is responsible for this problem.
> 
> They typically deal with environments where rpath is not an option. That
> does not apply to us. We have been fixing other packages with similar
> issues, so there is no reason for not doing it for LibreOffice too.

All my attempts failed.
If you can do it, feel free to improve wip/libreoffice4.

Thank you.

--
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on@yk.rim.or.jp
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]