[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: pine-info
Subject: Re: Suggestions to PINE improvment
From: David L Miller <dlm () cac ! washington ! edu>
Date: 1994-01-26 17:05:11
[Download RAW message or body]
Petr,
Thank you for the good suggestions! See my comments below.
|\ | |\/| David L. Miller dlm@cac.washington.edu (206) 685-6240
|/ |_ | | Software Engineer, Pine Development Team (206) 685-4045 (FAX)
University of Washington, Networks & Distributed Computing
4545 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98105, USA
On Wed, 26 Jan 1994, Petr Skoda wrote:
>
> Dear PINE developers,
> let me suggest several add-ons to your excellent program.
> I use it everyday and I am very satisfied with it.
> I came to PINE after notice of Barry Bouwsma in our local BITNET discussion
> list csinfo-l where we had been just discussing methods of processing
> of incoming mail from listservers. Soon after my comment that the Save
> should be done also by Sender field Barry modified the source of v 3.85
> and I am glad that you have included this in later versions
>
> After long time of usage of PINE I have several other ideas how to improve
> the management of mail from discussion lists:
>
> 1) The sort-key option should include value "sender", so I could have all
> mail from each listserver displayed together. Inside this should be
> applied the option arrival.
>
This is a good suggestion. We will also have other ways to group
messages in the next version of Pine. e.g. you will be able to Zoom in
on a set of messages.
> 2) Some listservers have very unconvenient Sender field that says little
> about the subject of the list (e.g. one Czech discussion list on SCO
> machine have sender field maiser.). So it would be nice to have some
> other configuration file (say .pinesaveto) which would map the sender:
> field to actual name of folder (including path)
>
The handling of the Sender field by listserv is very unfortunate. There
have been some other suggestions how to handle a save-by-alias operation,
but we have not decided on a strategy yet.
> 3) Other improvement could allow the save command from index screen with
> possibility of selection of several messages together (some form of marking
> -highlighting) and all messages from each sender.
>
This is coming in the next version of Pine.
> 4) Other configuration option (say header-display with values from:,
> sender:, recipient ... ) should change a form of presentation of headers
> in index. The from: field in massages form listserver is not very useful -
> better is sender: (but may left as it is if the sort-by-sender will be
> used)
>
This is an interesting suggestion. We will have to give it some
consideration.
> 5) For sending mail to international and local lists would be nice to have
> two various signatures (one in local language and in English). In BSD mail
> is the option ~A ~a for appending the .Signature and .signature
> files respectively. I suggest the usage of some key to include the
> .Signature file or .signature and have the possibility not to
> append it just after start of composing (say option choose-signature)
>
Several variations of this have been suggested. For now, you might try
naming your signature files .s and .S, then use ^R to read in the
appropriate one on each message.
> 6) There should be a possibility during Sending message to invoke a sendmail
> with -v (verbose mode) that displays a SMTP conversation between machines.
> It is useful when you try a new address and you are not sure wheather it is
> right or if you need to see that the massage was delivered to the target
> machine (to recipient) just now.
> I suggest either an auxiliary question
> "Verbose sending ? [n]:" after ^X (Send) or two cases of Send command
> ^X normal send in background
> ^x verbose mode.
>
Hmmm... This would definitely be a power-user feature...
BTW, ^x and ^X are the same character...
>
> I know that for processing of mail-lists there are better programs
> (e.g.procmail) but these will save incoming messages in time of delivery.
> But I want to see what has just come alltogether and then sort to various
> folders myself but with smallest effort (saving keystrokes).
>
Stay tuned, improvements are coming...
> Let me know, please, whether you have accepted any my suggestion and what
> form of its implementation will be used.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> *************************************************************************
> * Petr Skoda Phone : +42-204-85201, ext. 361 *
> * Stellar Department +42-2-724525 *
> * Astronomical Institute CAS Fax : +42-2-881611 *
> * 251 65 Ondrejov e-mail: skoda@sunstel.asu.cas.cz *
> * Czech Republic aststel@csearn.bitnet *
> *************************************************************************
>
>
>
>
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic