[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: pidgin-tracker
Subject: [Pidgin] #4522: SpreadPidginAvatars has no licensing
From: trac () pidgin ! im (Pidgin)
Date: 2007-12-30 18:39:34
Message-ID: 043.9cd249c6a9dd9e99a742b7bdb19bff83 () pidgin ! im
[Download RAW message or body]
#4522: SpreadPidginAvatars has no licensing information (and nor does the rest of
the wiki)
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: resiak | Owner: kstange
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: trac | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords:
Pending: 0 |
---------------------+------------------------------------------------------
Changes (by resiak):
* summary: SpreadPidginAvatars has no licensing information. =>
SpreadPidginAvatars has no licensing
information (and nor does the rest of the wiki)
Comment:
I was joking when I said we should just slap a license onto the existing
content ? we obviously need to contact each person. I'm inclined to think
that a content license such as one of the CC licenses (of which I think
attribution-sharealike best matches the uses we presumably want to allow
is probably a better choice than the GPL, mainly for the "what's the
source" reason.
However, we might at some point in the future want to adapt some of the
contents of the wiki to produce documentation to be shipped with Pidgin,
so it'd be prudent to pick a license that's DFSG- (and Fedora-, etc) free.
--
Ticket URL: <http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/4522#comment:4>
Pidgin <http://pidgin.im>
Pidgin
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic