[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pidgin-devel
Subject:    Re: Revision 15698906f0fff90b76df130d6cebe3f183c2cfaf
From:       "Mark Doliner" <mark () kingant ! net>
Date:       2007-09-26 6:58:01
Message-ID: 20070926065628.M92542 () kingant ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:24:54 -0500, Mark Doliner wrote
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:01:30 -0700, Sean Egan wrote
> > On 9/25/07, markdoliner@pidgin.im <markdoliner@pidgin.im> wrote:
> > > Is there any reason these statuses were set to not saveable and
> > > not user-settable?
> > 
> > Wouldn't that cause them to show up in the statusbox? And the saved
> > statuses stuff?
> 
> Hmm, it looks like it DOES show up in the saved status editor 
> (although it shows up as "Unset").  Does it make sense to show 
> independent status types there?  It seems like our UI doesn't really 
> handle that correctly, and we should hide independent statuses from 
> the user until it does.

It was showing up in the saved status editor regardless of my change.  I fixed
the "unset" thing (by giving it a name in status.c), and I changed the saved
status editor to never show TUNE or MOBILE, since they don't really make sense
in that context.

And I changed the substatus editor to not show independent statuses, so that
should fix that problem and hopefully not break anything else.

-Mark

_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@pidgin.im
http://pidgin.im/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]