[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       phpdoc
Subject:    Re: [PHP-DOC] Question about "appendices/migration52.xml"
From:       "Hannes Magnusson" <hannes.magnusson () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-01-09 16:31:58
Message-ID: 7f3ed2c30801090831y54132bc8hfc562d96d93a7416 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Jan 9, 2008 2:59 PM, Simion Onea <simion.onea@bem.md> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hannes Magnusson [mailto:hannes.magnusson@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2008 3:13 PM
> > To: Simion Onea
> > Cc: PHPdoc
> > Subject: Re: [PHP-DOC] Question about "appendices/migration52.xml"
> >
> > If the function isn't documented yet then I think the full
> > funcsynopsis is needed, for documented functions it is enough
> > to name the function (and the new parameter when appropriate).
> >
> > -Hannes
>
> Ok, then I understand that I should not touch them.
> But what about enclosing the function definition inside
> <synopsis></synopsis> ?

I wouldn't waste my time on it. Documenting these functions (even just
with the basic param info) would be better use of time :)

-Hannes
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]