[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-performance
Subject:    Re: [PERFORM] Experience with HP Smart Array P400 and SATA drives?
From:       Mario Weilguni <mweilguni () sime ! com>
Date:       2008-12-10 12:29:13
Message-ID: 493FB619.5060205 () sime ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Aidan Van Dyk schrieb:
> * Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> [081209 11:01]:
>  
>   
>> Yes the SmartArray series is quite common and actually know to perform
>> reasonably well, in RAID 10. You still appear to be trying RAID 5.
>>     
>
> *boggle* 
>
> Are people *still* using raid5?
>
> /me gives up!
>
>   

Why not? I know it's not performing as good as RAID-10, but it does not 
waste 50% diskspace. RAID-6 is no option, because the performance is 
even worse. And, on another system with RAID-5 + spare and SAS drives, 
the same controller is working very well.


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]