[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-performance
Subject:    Re: [PERFORM] Less rows -> better performance?
From:       Andreas Hartmann <andreas () apache ! org>
Date:       2008-07-21 14:45:10
Message-ID: 4884A0F6.2000501 () apache ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Guillaume Smet schrieb:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Andreas Hartmann <andreas@apache.org> wrote:
>> SELECT pg_database.datname,
>> pg_size_pretty(pg_database_size(pg_database.datname)) AS size
>> FROM pg_database where pg_database.datname = 'vvz_live_1';
>>
>>    datname    |  size
>> ---------------+---------
>>  vvz_live_1    | 2565 MB
>>
>> I wonder why the actual size is so much bigger than the data-only dump - is
>> this because of index data etc.?
> 
> More probably because the database is totally bloated. Do you run
> VACUUM regularly or did you set up autovacuum?

Thanks for the hint!

I just verified that the autovacuum property is enabled. I did the 
following to prepare the tests:

- setup two test databases, let's call them db_all and db_current
- import the dump from the live DB into both test DBs
- delete the old semester data from db_current, leaving only the current 
data

Both test DBs were 600 MB large after this. I did a VACUUM FULL ANALYZE 
on both of them now. db_all didn't shrink significantly (only 1 MB), 
db_current shrunk to 440 MB. We're using quite a lot of indexes, I guess 
that's why that much data are allocated.

-- Andreas

-- 
Andreas Hartmann, CTO
BeCompany GmbH
http://www.becompany.ch
Tel.: +41 (0) 43 818 57 01

-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]