[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: Avoid unecessary MemSet call (src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c)
From:       Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut () enterprisedb ! com>
Date:       2022-06-30 22:37:23
Message-ID: 4772a6f5-0942-e073-965e-d45fd1243765 () enterprisedb ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 19.05.22 18:09, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Taking it a step further.
> Created a new patch into commitfest, targeting 16 version.
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3645/ 
> <https://commitfest.postgresql.org/38/3645/>

I have committed your 001 patch, which was clearly a (harmless) mistake.

I have also committed a patch that gets rid of MemSet() calls where the 
value is a constant not-0, because that just falls back to memset() anyway.

I'm on board with trying to get rid of MemSet(), but first I need to 
analyze all the performance numbers and arguments that were shown in 
this thread.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]