[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Hash indexes and effective_cache_size in CREATE INDEX documentation
From:       Peter Geoghegan <pg () heroku ! com>
Date:       2016-07-31 17:06:44
Message-ID: CAM3SWZRjyBhHnAVnHA1R6cJw7i-s++FXc=rSogK+=N+tQoVp-w () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> After looking at that a bit, I'm strongly tempted to just take out
> the last two sentences of the para, reducing it to the advice concerning
> maintenance_work_mem.  That seems sufficient to describe the current
> behavior, and given our awful track record about maintaining this
> documentation, I'm not sure that going into more detail is really
> a good idea.  Comments?

+1

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]