[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Doubt about AccessExclusiveLock in ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. );
From:       Robert Haas <robertmhaas () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-03-31 17:17:03
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZyBp8rnWimAdCQoquZhaP=jBJDfane6QsrFqowTgWwjA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached a very WIP patch to reduce lock level when setting autovacuum
> reloptions in "ALTER TABLE .. SET ( .. )" statement.

I think the first thing we need to here is analyze all of the options
and determine what the appropriate lock level is for each, and why.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]