[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Should we add crc32 in libpgport?
From:       Tom Lane <tgl () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us>
Date:       2012-02-29 0:55:05
Message-ID: 17778.1330476905 () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> writes:
> Thinking unnecessary.  Motion is progress.  Here is a patch that uses
> this exact plan: pgport for the tables, broken out into a header file
> that is included in the building of libpgport.  I have confirmed by
> objdump -t that multiple copies of the table are not included in the
> postgres binary and the bloat has not occurred.

Applied with minor adjustments; mainly, I cleaned up some additional
traces of the old way of building pg_resetxlog and pg_controldata.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]