[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Why so few built-in range types?
From:       Robert Haas <robertmhaas () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-11-30 22:56:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZChY_K=stGN0aeMngKhJnOjS4kbD7+0C_9LK=krco4ww () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Erm, isn't there a contrib type that already does all that for you..?
> ip4r or whatever?  Just saying, if you're looking for that capability..

Oh, huh, good to know.  Still, I'm not sure why you need to load a
separate type to get this... there's no reason why the built-in CIDR
type couldn't support it.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]