[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] loss of transactions in streaming replication
From:       Robert Haas <robertmhaas () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-11-30 20:37:24
Message-ID: CA+TgmobcopKvRbkdKh_qXEwMbQYa0Sg3xEu5cd1XcaOLzN_mqA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> OK, so this is an artifact of the changes to make libpq communication
>>>> bidirectional.  But I'm still confused about where the error is coming
>>>> from.  In your OP, you wrote "In 9.2dev and 9.1, when walreceiver
>>>> detects an error while sending data to WAL stream, it always emits
>>>> ERROR even if there are data available in the receive buffer."  So
>>>> that implied to me that this is only going to trigger if you have a
>>>> shutdown together with an awkwardly-timed error.  But your scenario
>>>> for reproducing this problem doesn't seem to involve an error.
>>>
>>> Yes, my scenario doesn't cause any real error. My original description was
>>> misleading. The following would be closer to the truth:
>>>
>>>    "In 9.2dev and 9.1, when walreceiver detects the termination of replication
>>>    connection while sending data to WAL stream, it always emits ERROR
>>>    even if there are data available in the receive buffer."
>>
>> Ah, OK.  I think I now agree that this is a bug and that we should fix
>> and back-patch.
>
> The patch that I posted before is well-formed enough to be adopted?

Does this still need to be worked on?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]