[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Linux LSB init script
From:       Peter Eisentraut <peter_e () gmx ! net>
Date:       2009-09-30 17:32:11
Message-ID: 1254331931.24827.3.camel () vanquo ! pezone ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:58 -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Right.  It seems that, in addition to the above, there also remains
> some disagreement about:
>  
> (1)  how much checking the script should do to provide error messages
> and exit codes which target the specific problems versus generic "I'm
> broken" messages for problems which prevent it from getting to the
> point of being able to run pg_ctl,
>  
> (2)  whether the log functions required by the standard should be
> used, or whether we should assume that output to stdout and/or stderr
> (which the standard says may be silently discarded without showing
> anywhere) should be used instead,
>  
> (3)  whether we should provide comments of the general intent of
> sections of code when the implementing code is providing functionality
> required by the standard, versus assuming that the reader can match
> the code portions to the relevant sections of the standard without
> supporting comments.

I'm not so worried about these points.  They can always be adjusted
later.  The point about how to involve pg_ctl is more critical.



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]