[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Using results from INSERT ... RETURNING
From:       Tom Lane <tgl () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us>
Date:       2009-09-29 16:36:28
Message-ID: 11377.1254242188 () sss ! pgh ! pa ! us
[Download RAW message or body]

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>> BTW what was the conclusion of the idea about having three separate
>> nodes Insert, Delete, Update instead of a single Dml node?

> It wasn't obvious from reading the patch why multiple node types would
> be superior; but I'm not 100% sure I understand what Tom had in mind,
> either.

I thought they would be simpler/faster individually.  However, that
might not be enough to outweigh 3x repetition of the per-node-type
boilerplate.  I haven't read the patch yet so this isn't an informed
recommendation, just a suggestion of an alternative to consider.

			regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]