[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] FSM rewrite committed, loose ends
From:       "Dave Page" <dpage () pgadmin ! org>
Date:       2008-09-30 14:00:51
Message-ID: 937d27e10809300700w2277d4bbu624308fbbc245f90 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

>> For convenience, would it be possible to see about having all this
>> provided by PostgreSQL?
>>  a. pg_relation_size()
>>  b. pg_relation_toast_size()
>>  c. pg_relation_fsm_size()
>>  d. pg_relation_indexes_size()
>>  e. pg_total_relation_size() = a + b + c + d
>>
>> Are there some other things to add in the mix?
>
> Should pg_relation_indexes_size() include the FSMs of the indexes? Should
> pg_relation_toast_size() include the toast index and FSM as well?

It might be worth revisiting the near identical discussions we had
when Andreas & I integrated this stuff into the backend for 8.1.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]