[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: pgsql-hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key
From: Tino Wildenhain <tino () wildenhain ! de>
Date: 2008-05-11 9:13:05
Message-ID: 4826B8A1.9070504 () wildenhain ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
>>> Well it should be optional but it would be nice if we had the option
>>> to have it renamed per the default... meaning the same output if I
>>> were to do this:
>>
>> If you want that, you can rename the index (either before or afterwards).
>> I don't see any reason to clutter the make-constraint-from-index command
>> with questions of renaming.
>
> As a counter point, I don't see any reason to make the DBA's life
> harder. Sure it is just one step but it is a human step, prone to error
> and taking more time than it should. Why not just make it easy?
> Especially when the easy isn't sacrificing data integrity or quality of
> product?
well the name is by no means a functional problem. Its merely cosmetics,
so if you want propose that a warning is issued to suggest a saner name.
This should be sufficient I think.
T.
["smime.p7s" (application/x-pkcs7-signature)]
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic