[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgsql-hackers
Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key
From:       Andrew Sullivan <ajs () commandprompt ! com>
Date:       2008-05-11 2:41:56
Message-ID: 20080511024156.GA52350 () commandprompt ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:55:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> IMHO a utility command should do one easily-explained thing.  The fewer
> options the better.

Sticking to that principle makes for a better-maintained system.  I
agree.  If we want to point out, "You might rename your index
afterwards to make it look like other default primary keys," I have no
objection.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]