[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pgp-keyserver-folk
Subject:    Re: [Sks-devel] Re: Subkey keyid indexing
From:       David Shaw <dshaw () jabberwocky ! com>
Date:       2003-07-18 15:20:55
[Download RAW message or body]


On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:34:10PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:

> > what they want... and even then, with old HKP servers, they won't.
> > It's a mess.
> 
> Ok, I think that can convince me.  I was thinking more about the
> incentive for server implementors to do it 'right'. Perhaps make it
> a SHOULD?

Ok.

I'm still not completely happy with the include subkeys option.  It's
messy - options that may or may not be acted on (i.e. "include
subkeys"), with no way for older servers to indicate back that the
option wasn't followed.  This needs some more thought.

David

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]