[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pfsense-support
Subject:    Re: [pfSense Support] Static routes again
From:       Gary Buckmaster <gary () centipedenetworks ! com>
Date:       2007-12-14 15:07:56
Message-ID: 47629C4C.8090905 () centipedenetworks ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Steve,

I mean the netstat output from your pfSense box.  That netstat output 
appears to be from a linux machine.

-Gary

Steve Harman wrote:
> Nothing too unusual I don't think Gary:
> 
> % netstat -lr
> 
> Kernel IP routing table
> 
> Destination     Gateway        Genmask         Flags   MSS Window irtt Iface
> 192.168.1.0     *              255.255.255.0   U         0 0         0 eth0
> 169.254.0.0     *              255.255.0.0     U         0 0         0 eth0
> default         firegate.envisi 0.0.0.0        UG        0 0         0 eth0
> 
> "default" has the correct gateway entry for the client, so it's making it as far as \
> the pfSense box yet the static route to the remote network seems to be being \
> ignored. 
> Steve
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Buckmaster [mailto:gary@centipedenetworks.com] 
> Sent: 14 December 2007 13:56
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Static routes again
> 
> Steve,
> 
> What's netstat -lr say about your route?  Pay specific attention to the 
> interface that the route is applied to.  I ran into a really weird issue 
> with creating a static route yesterday and I'm going to try and 
> re-create it in my test environment today. 
> 
> -Gary
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscribe@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-help@pfsense.com


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]