[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pfsense-discussion
Subject:    Re: [pfSense] Security packages, intrusion prevention
From:       Steve Yates <steve () teamITS ! com>
Date:       2015-06-26 14:44:59
Message-ID: ae465fb7c7da4a41974bb5a09fdd1bb8 () ITS-SERVER-1 ! its ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

	Yes that's the sort of thing, or I saw the reference about pfBlockerNG (which isn't classified a "security" package).  Just wondering about resources, effectiveness, etc.  I've seen some comments about needing the premium feeds or services for either of those or Untangle, for even decent effectiveness, and any paid sort of option seems to start around $300-500 per year.  Obviously you get what you pay for but it's left unclear how "ineffective" the free services are.  Smaller clients aren't going to pay $500 but then again they aren't running web servers in house, and the antivirus we prefer includes IDS.

--

Steve Yates
ITS, Inc.


Travis Hansen wrote on Thu, Jun 25 2015 at 7:01 pm:

> Are you after snort and/or suricata?  Probably others available as
> well.. Travis Hansen travisghansen@yahoo.com
> 
> 
>      On Thursday, June 25, 2015 4:17 PM, Steve Yates <steve@teamITS.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
>      We're considering using something like pfSense for more active perimeter
> security for clients, in front of web servers, etc.  Do you generally add packages
> into pfSense for that?  If so, which ones?  Or do you use something separate in-
> line, like say Untangle?

_______________________________________________
pfSense mailing list
https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic