[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pfsense-discussion
Subject:    Re: [pfSense] Remote Digium IP Phone Provisioning via pfSense - Update!
From:       Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom ! mu>
Date:       2013-06-11 16:00:37
Message-ID: 201306111800.41222.mark.tinka () seacom ! mu
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Tuesday, June 11, 2013 05:12:08 PM Scott Lambert wrote:

> Wait, Cisco?  ASA or PIX?  Does the Cisco have SIP fixups
> enabled?

No NAT running on the Cisco (7200's and 3800's). 

The Cisco is purely providing clear routing to pfSense, on 
public addressing. NAT (and some routing) is performed by 
pfSense.

I figured this may (or may not) be an issue since SIP 
registrations from X-Lite work through the same path.

Mark.

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]