[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pfsense-discussion
Subject:    RE: [pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge
From:       Greg Hennessy <Greg.Hennessy () nviz ! net>
Date:       2008-10-05 10:16:55
Message-ID: 6CE8D2A5CE118747811E51143A68BA0A721CE3E06D () PEMEXMBXVS01 ! jellyfishnet ! co ! uk ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

Just as an FYI and to give the creative juices something to consider :-).

Other firewall solutions terminate IPSEC on a Layer two firewall, by configuring the \
tunnel endpoint address on the device as a Cisco style 'loopback' interface. As you \
can imagine, this has a lot of advantages.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eugen Leitl [mailto:eugen@leitl.org]
> Sent: 05 October 2008 10:32
> To: discussion@pfsense.com
> Subject: [pfSense-discussion] IPsec tunnel to a transparent bridge
> 
> 
> Almost a year ago, Chris Buechler told me
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/discussion@pfsense.com/msg02426.html
> 
> > In a transparent bridge setup, the gateway of the hosts on the
> > bridge isn't going to be pfsense, it'll be something on the
> > outside interface. If you have a routed subnet setup on an OPT
> > interface this will work fine.
> 
> Unfortunately, I have only WAN and LAN. a) Is there a way to set
> up a routed subnet via Virtual IPs?
> 
> b) assuming yes, how I do that?
> 
> --
> Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
> ______________________________________________________________
> ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
> 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]