[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       pfsense-discussion
Subject:    Re: [pfSense-discussion] nat
From:       Scott Ullrich <sullrich () gmail ! com>
Date:       2005-03-29 15:51:11
Message-ID: d5992baf050329075144e8477a () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

This should be working okay on the latest version.   The optional
interface now has a gateway which we basically create reply-to rules
with.

Scott


On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:17:41 +0100, alan walters <alan@aillweecave.ie> wrote:
>  
>  
> 
> I am trying to work out the ordering of nat rules on freebsd. 
> 
>   
> 
> For some time I have been trying to get an inbound nat working on opt 1 but
> I don't get a connection.the rule is in the xml config file but on the web
> page the interface is blanked out instead of showing . 
> 
>   
> 
> So presently I am considering using 1 to 1 nat for some machines and
> standard rules for others. Do you think there are any issues here 
>  
> 
> --
>  No virus found in this outgoing message.
>  Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>  Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.4 - Release Date: 27/03/2005
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]