[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: perl-module-build
Subject: Re: @INC paths for TAP::Harness
From: "David E. Wheeler" <david () kineticode ! com>
Date: 2008-07-09 22:56:29
Message-ID: 52EC204D-0D51-48D8-A03D-0485D573FCCA () kineticode ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Jul 9, 2008, at 14:25, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> But alas, like Test::Harness, we have perpetuated a culture of
> assuming
> that your @INC always magically appears in the child process --
> including in M::B's own code. That might be unsurprising most of the
> time, but it does make a certain class of setups relatively
> impossible.
Well, perhaps we shouldn't perpetuate that for TAP::Harness usage, eh?
> Anyway, I've decided that doing anything more correct is made of suck
> and would just require me to explain it too often, so I will just be
> foisting @INC into the test.
>
> I'm nearly certain it will break on redhat.
I think it's the other way around: redhat is broken. ;-P
Best,
David
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic