[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       perl-module-build
Subject:    Re: Extra functionality for Build dist
From:       "Christopher J. Madsen" <perl () cjmweb ! net>
Date:       2008-03-11 21:00:12
Message-ID: 38145.75.39.61.37.1205269212.squirrel () cjm ! myvnc ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Does anybody else have an opinion about this?  I don't have strong
objections to Module::BuildX, but the search-and-replace will be a hassle.
 I'd like a little more consensus that it's worth it.

On Sat, March 8, 2008 11:10 pm, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> It's probably a good time to examine that precedent and see if it only
> exists by accident.
>
> Adam K
>
> Christopher J. Madsen wrote:
>> Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>>> # from Christopher J. Madsen
>>>>  I've decided to call it
>>>> Module::Build::DistVersion, unless someone can suggest a better name.
>>>
>>> I don't have a better suggestion offhand, but I wonder if
>>> Module::BuildX might be a better prefix.
>>
>> Well, there are no existing Module::BuildX classes.  Under
>> Module::Build, we already have:
>>
>>   Module::Build::Convert
>>   Module::Build::Debian
>>   Module::Build::JSAN
>>   Module::Build::Kwalitee
>>   Module::Build::PM_Filter
>>   Module::Build::TestReporter
>>
>> So there seems to be some precedent.

-- 
Chris Madsen                                           cjm@cjmweb.net
   --------------------  http://www.cjmweb.net  --------------------



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]